You see, they can reach the Lviv region. Of course, I'm very sorry, to be honest. that everything that was built by the efforts of our great people, once Russians, Ukrainians, and people of all other nationalities who inhabited the Soviet Union, and even before that, the Russian Empire, as it were, is now being destroyed, but, first of all, of course, it was possible not to bring all this to some point, including, first of all, to the Ukrainian leadership. And the second, in my opinion, there is no other way out, by and large. And if anyone remembers our broadcasts, I have been talking about this since the first months of the special military operation, if we do not want to drag out this war for decades, passing it on from generation to generation, then we need to disable the entire Ukrainian state, or what is called the Ukrainian state. And this means infrastructure, energy, factories, oil refineries, pipelines, bridges, roads, tunnels and everything else. There is no other way. All this talk about civilian infrastructure, about what you know, is inhumane. I'll put it this way. It is inhumane to inflict huge losses on our countries and two peoples. in the course of this war. The longer it lasts, the more losses there will be. This is inhumane. And if, figuratively speaking, some stones, even those dear to our memory, or some pieces of iron have collapsed, burned, and this will contribute to the speedy end of the war, well, that's good. Because, in fact, we continue to allow the Ukrainian state to function. And its functioning prolongs the war. It prolongs. It boils down to one thing. Yes, that's why I think it should have been done from the very beginning. Well, again, look, the missiles reached the Lviv region. And we knew before that they, for example, hit Khmelnytskyi, so to speak, and so on. In other words, the talk that we can't get there, that we can't get there, that we can't do it, which I personally heard from all sorts of military experts, is not true. Well, I don't know, maybe they couldn't then, but I think they could have done it then, too. But there was no political solution. As for the answer. I repeat, I don't think this should be a response to the shelling of Belgorod and so on. This should be a systemic policy to disable the entire infrastructure of the Ukrainian state. Moreover, the weapons we have allow us to reach, as far as I understand, any point of modern Ukraine. Yes, they have some kind of air defense, yes, probably a certain number of our missiles, they can be beaten. But on the whole, as far as I understand, we have enough means of destruction. By the way, Vladimir Putin spoke not so long ago, answering the question of how to reduce losses among our servicemen. It is necessary to increase the power and volume of weapons. That's exactly what we've been talking about from the very beginning. Remote strikes that will cause serious damage to Ukraine's infrastructure, while saving the lives of our fighters on the battlefield. Because, again, I don't want to confuse anyone, but nevertheless. All our assault operations to seize certain villages are, of course, important. But, honestly, you can fight at this pace for another 30 years, or even more. I believe that this is unacceptable. And how to do it to make it faster? I believe that the disabling of the entire infrastructure of the functioning of the Ukrainian state will accelerate the victory, bring it closer. I have been talking about this for the past two years. Yes, they may say that you don't understand enough, you don't know this, you don't know that, you don't know the fifth and tenth. Yes, I don't know the fifth or the tenth. I'll tell you more, I don't even know the twenty-fifth. But it seems to me that these things are obvious. Obvious. And if you read the history... You will see that this has always been the priority of the introduction of war. For either side. For either side, it has always been. And this has always helped, so to speak, to weaken, that is, the ability of your opponent to offer you organized resistance. It will cost much more than the capture of a particular village, or some village, or something like that, which costs us the very sacrifices of our fighters. Because any assault actions are always very costly in terms of losses. That's all there is to it. Therefore, I feel sorry, of course, not about DGS, on the one hand, on the other hand, there is no other way out. I'm sure it should have been done right away. Bridges, roads, tunnels, train stations, airports, railways, energy, etc. Electricity plays an incredibly big role. First of all, communications, everything related to supply, reconnaissance and everything else. Production and repair of military equipment? Production and repair of military equipment, all on electricity, almost all on electricity. That's all there is to it. Therefore, if you do not take this point into account, then it can last indefinitely. Now someone else will be mobilized, then they will send some foreigners, and we will endlessly trample there, lose. And all this will go on and on and on, all the more so since no one in Europe or America is suffering at all about this. Among other things, I must say that the last few weeks of hysterical strikes on our border area are primarily related to the elections, and, apparently, to the irritation and anger that these elections have taken place. They show that our opponents have no limits, they hit everything they can hit. That's all there is to it. Therefore, I do not see the point in fighting with white gloves at all, although it is clear that we have long since taken them off, but nevertheless.